The Fairy Tale Ending of the War on Terror?
May 1, 2011. It was late. Most of America was getting ready for bed or already asleep. Then, the news broke. It smashed through the silence like a sledgehammer. President Barack Obama walked down the long hallway of the White House, stood at the podium, and looked the camera dead in the eye.
“Tonight, I can report to the American people and to the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden.”
Crowds gathered outside the White House. Cheers erupted in Times Square. It was the perfect ending. The boogeyman was dead. Justice had been served. It felt like a movie. The brave Navy SEALs flying into hostile territory, the firefight, the double-tap, the extraction. It was clean. It was heroic. It was the “Hollywood” ending we all wanted.
But what if it was all total nonsense?
What if the story we were told—the story that became the movie Zero Dark Thirty—was nothing more than a carefully constructed piece of theater designed to boost poll numbers and hide a much darker geopolitical secret?
Enter Seymour Hersh: The Man Who Doesn’t Miss
Fast forward to May 2015. Four years after the raid. The dust had settled. The history books were written. Then, Seymour Hersh dropped a bomb. And not a small one.
For those who don’t know, Seymour Hersh isn’t some guy with a blog in his basement. He is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist. He’s the guy who exposed the My Lai Massacre during Vietnam. He’s the one who ripped the cover off the Abu Ghraib prison scandal. When Hersh speaks, the intelligence community starts sweating.
Hersh published a massive, sprawling report in the London Review of Books that basically said: Everything you know about the Bin Laden raid is a lie.
According to Hersh, there was no secret infiltration. There was no firefight. Bin Laden wasn’t “hiding” in the traditional sense. And the Pakistanis? They weren’t clueless. They were the ones holding the keys.
The “Walk-In” Asset: Following the Money
The official story tells us that the CIA spent years tracking a courier. They followed the breadcrumbs. It was brilliant spycraft. Computers, satellites, diligent analysts working overtime.
Hersh says: No. That’s not how it happened.
According to his sources, the break didn’t come from a satellite feed. It came from greed. Pure and simple.
A former Pakistani intelligence officer allegedly walked into the US Embassy in Islamabad. He didn’t want glory. He wanted the reward. Remember the $25 million bounty on Bin Laden’s head? This guy wanted to cash out. He told the CIA, “I know where he is.”
Why? Because Bin Laden was supposedly a prisoner.
This is where the story gets wild. Hersh claims that the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)—Pakistan’s version of the CIA—had been holding Bin Laden captive in that Abbottabad compound since 2006. He wasn’t running an empire of terror from a hidden fortress. He was an old, sick man in a cage, kept by the Pakistani government to use as leverage against the Taliban and the United States.
The “Cage” Theory: Why Keep Him Alive?
Think about it. It makes terrifying sense. If you are Pakistan, and you have the world’s most wanted man, do you kill him? No. You keep him. He is the ultimate bargaining chip.
Saudi Arabia was reportedly paying Pakistan to keep him under house arrest. The US was pouring billions in aid into Pakistan to help fight the War on Terror. If Bin Laden is found, the game changes. If he’s dead, the money might stop. But as long as he is “at large,” the checks keep clearing.
Hersh suggests that the US found out about this arrangement and essentially put a gun to Pakistan’s head. The deal was simple: “Give him to us, let us kill him, and we won’t tell the world that you were hiding him.”
It was a face-saving measure. Pakistan couldn’t admit they were sheltering him (that would start a war with the US). The US couldn’t admit Pakistan was an ally who betrayed them (that would be a diplomatic nightmare). So, they scripted a play.
The Blackout: A Staged Raid?
If you believe the Hersh account, the “raid” wasn’t a raid. It was a handover. An execution.
The night of the operation, the electricity in Abbottabad was cut off. The Pakistani military—who had a massive presence nearby—stayed in their barracks. They didn’t scramble jets. They didn’t fire anti-aircraft missiles. Why? Because they were told to stand down.
The SEALs flew in. The doors were unlocked. The guards were gone. Hersh claims there was no “intense firefight” as initially reported by the White House. The only shots fired were the ones that killed Bin Laden. He was unarmed. He was old. He was barely mobile.
It was an assassination. Plain and simple.
The Body Problem: Where is Osama?
This brings us to the biggest, most lingering question of the last decade. The body.
The US government claims that out of “respect for Islamic tradition,” they buried Bin Laden at sea within 24 hours. They flew him to the USS Carl Vinson, performed a ceremony, and slid him into the North Arabian Sea.
Does that smell right to you?
Since when does the US government care so deeply about the religious funeral rites of a man responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans? We displayed the bodies of Uday and Qusay Hussein. We released photos of Che Guevara. Proof of death is the standard. It shuts down conspiracies. It offers closure.
But for the most famous terrorist in history? Nothing. No photos. No video. No DNA confirmation released to the public. Just “trust us.”
Hersh’s report offers a grotesque alternative. He suggests that there wasn’t much of a body left to bury. The SEALs, pumped full of adrenaline and rage, may have obliterated the target. The “burial at sea” story was a cover-up for the fact that there was no intact body to show the world. Some rumors even suggest parts of the remains were thrown out of the helicopter over the Hindu Kush mountains on the flight back.
It sounds horrific. It sounds impossible. But is it more impossible than a respectful burial at sea for a mass murderer?
The “Dead Since 2001” Theory
Now, let’s zoom out. Let’s get really weird. Hersh claims Bin Laden died in 2011. But there is a massive community of researchers, doctors, and political analysts who believe Bin Laden never made it to 2011 in the first place.
Go back to 2001. December. There were reports—credible reports—that Bin Laden was suffering from Marfan syndrome and severe renal failure. He needed dialysis machines. He was frail. A French newspaper, Le Figaro, reported he was treated in a Dubai hospital in July 2001. CBS News reported he was getting dialysis the night before 9/11.
How does a man on dialysis survive in Tora Bora caves for a decade? How does he run up mountains? Where do you plug in a dialysis machine in a spider hole in Waziristan?
FormerPakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, in a 2007 interview with David Frost, casually mentioned that Bin Laden had been “murdered” by Omar Sheikh years prior. She said it like it was common knowledge. Months later? She was assassinated.
Coincidence?
The Boogeyman Utility
Why keep a dead man alive on TV? It’s the ultimate control mechanism. As long as Bin Laden is “out there,” you can justify the Patriot Act. You can justify the TSA searching your shoes. You can justify invading Iraq (even though they had nothing to do with it). You can justify a trillion-dollar defense budget.
If he died of kidney failure in 2001, the war loses its villain. The story loses its steam. The intelligence agencies needed him to be the Goldstein to their Big Brother.
So, the audio tapes kept coming. The grainy videos kept appearing. But notice… they got blurrier. The beard color changed. The rhetoric shifted. Was it him? Or was it a digital ghost kept alive by intelligence agencies to keep the war machine churning?
The 2015 Hersh Fallout: Why It Matters Now
When Seymour Hersh released his report, the mainstream media attacked him. They called him conspiracy-addled. They said he lost his touch. The White House issued fierce denials.
But slowly, cracks appeared in the official story.
We later learned that there *was* a blackout in Abbottabad. We learned that the “courier” story had massive holes. We learned that the Pakistani military was indeed suspiciously inactive that night.
The implications here are staggering. If Hersh is right, it means the Obama administration, in the lead-up to the 2012 election, manufactured a heroic narrative to secure a second term. It means they lied about Pakistan’s cooperation. It means the “War on Terror” was actually a “Game of Terror,” played between frenemies who shared intelligence when the price was right.
The Seal Team 6 Tragedy
And what about the men who were there? The members of SEAL Team 6. The heroes.
Only a few months after the Bin Laden raid, a Chinook helicopter (Extortion 17) was shot down in Afghanistan. It was the deadliest single incident for the US military in the entire war. 38 people died. Among them? Members of SEAL Team 6.
Families of the fallen have demanded answers for years. They ask why the team was flown into a hot zone in an old, slow helicopter. They ask why the black box was never found or was “washed away.” They ask if their sons were silenced.
It’s a dark road to go down. But when the official story has so many holes, you can’t blame people for looking into the shadows.
The Trust Deficit
We live in an era where trust in institutions is at an all-time low. And stories like the Bin Laden raid are the reason why.
They told us there were WMDs in Iraq. There weren’t.
They told us the NSA wasn’t spying on Americans. They were.
They told us the Bin Laden raid was a solo US mission against a hiding mastermind. Hersh tells us it was a paid-for assassination of a geriatric prisoner.
Which version feels more real to you? The Hollywood blockbuster with the perfect ending? Or the messy, dirty, money-driven deal in the backrooms of intelligence agencies?
The truth is likely buried somewhere in the North Arabian Sea. Or maybe it was scattered over the Hindu Kush. Or maybe, just maybe, it died in a hospital bed in 2001, and we’ve been chasing a ghost ever since.
One thing is certain: The history books might be written by the victors, but the truth has a funny way of bubbling up when you least expect it.
What do you think? Was Hersh right? Is Bin Laden still alive? Did he die years ago? Let us know in the comments below. We read everything.
——————
Dig deeper into the rabbit hole:
– Is Bin Laden Still Alive?: Watch Here
– Does The USA Use Terror To Start Wars?: Watch Here
– The Bush- Bin Laden Family Connection: Watch Here
——————
Like us on Facebook – http://on.fb.me/1eWsxhV
Follow us on Twitter – http://bit.ly/MNqFgY
Alltime’s greatest conspiracies… http://bit.ly/1eRToNK
Originally posted 2015-05-23 17:00:10. Republished by Blog Post Promoter
