1. September 11, 2001

Thanks to the power of the web and live broadcasts on television, the conspiracy theories surrounding the events of 9/11 – when terrorists attacked the World Trade Centre in New York and the Pentagon in Washington – have surpassed those of Roswell and JFK in traction. Despite repeated claims by al-Qaeda that it planned, organised and orchestrated the attacks, several official and unofficial investigations into the collapse of the Twin Towers which concluded that structural failure was responsible and footage of the events themselves, the conspiracy theories continue to grow in strength.

At the milder end of the spectrum are the theorists who believe that the US government had prior warning of the attacks but did not do enough to stop them. Others believe that the Bush administration deliberately turned a blind eye to those warnings because it wanted a pretext to launch wars in the Middle East to usher in another century of American hegemony. A large group of people – collectively called the 9/11 Truth Movement – cite evidence that an airliner did not hit the Pentagon and that the World Trade Centre could not have been brought down by airliner impacts and burning aviation fuel alone. This final group points to video evidence which they claim shows puffs of smoke – so-called demoliton squibs – emerging from the Twin Towers at levels far below the aircraft impact zones and prior to the collapses. They also believe that, on the day itself, the US air force was deliberately stood down or sent on exercises to prevent intervention that could have saved the lives of nearly 3,000 people.

Many witnesses – including firemen, policemen and people who were inside the towers at the time – claim to have heard explosions below the aircraft impacts (including in basement levels) and before both the collapses and the attacks themselves. As with the assassination of JFK, the official inquiry into the events – the 9/11 Commission Report – is widely derided by the conspiracy community and held up as further evidence that 9/11 was an “inside job”. Scientific journals have consistently rejected these hypotheses.

2. The assassination of John F Kennedy

The 35th President of the United States was shot on Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas at 12.30pm . He was fatally wounded by gunshots while riding with his wife – Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy – in a motorcade. The ten-month investigation of the Warren Commission of 1963 to 1964, the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) of 1976 to 1979, and other government investigations concluded that the President had been assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald – who was himself shot dead by Jack Ruby while in police custody.

But doubts about the official explanation and the conclusion that Oswald was the lone gunman firing from the Texas Book Depository overlooking Dealey Plaza where Kennedy was hit surfaced soon after the commission report. Footage of the motorcade taken by Abraham Zapruder on 8mm film supported the growing belief that at least four shots were fired – not the three that the Warren Commission claimed. The moments of impact recorded on the film also suggested that at least one of the shots came from a completely different direction to those supposedly fired by Oswald – evidence backed up by testimony of several eye witnesses. Many believed that several shots were fired by gunmen hiding behind a picket fence on a grassy knoll overlooking the plaza.

The assassination is still the subject of widespread speculation and has   spawned numerous conspiracy theories, though none of these has been proven.   In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) found both the   original FBI investigation and the Warren Commission Report to be seriously   flawed. The HSCA also concluded that there were at least four shots fired   and that it was probable that a conspiracy existed. However, later studies,   including one by the National Academy of Sciences, have called into question   the accuracy of the evidence used by the HSCA to support its finding of four   shots.

3. A flying saucer crashed at Roswell in 1947

The event that kick-started more than a half century of conspiracy theories   surrounding unidentified flying objects (UFOs). Something did crash at   Roswell, New Mexico, sometime before July 7, 1947 and – at first – the US   authorities stated explicitly that this was a flying saucer or disk – as   shown by the splash story on that day’s Roswell Daily Record, pictured.   Numerous witnesses reported seeing metallic debris scattered over a wide   area and at least one reported seeing a blazing craft crossing the sky   shortly before it crashed. In recent years, witnesses have added significant   new details, including claims of a large military operation dedicated to   recovering alien craft and aliens themselves, at as many as 11 crash sites,   and alleged witness intimidation. In 1989, former mortician Glenn Dennis   claimed that he was involved in alien autopsies which were carried out at   the Roswell air force base.

The conspiracy theory has been fanned by the US military repeatedly changing   its story. Within hours of the army telling reporters that it had recovered   a crashed saucer, senior officers insisted that the only thing that had   fallen from the sky had been a weather balloon. A report by the Office of   the Secretary of the Air Force released in 1995, concluded that the reported   recovered material in 1947 was likely debris from a secret government   program called Project Mogul, which involved high altitude balloons meant to   detect sound waves generated by Soviet atom bomb tests and ballistic   missiles.

A second report, released in 1997, concluded that reports of alien bodies were   likely a combination of innocently transformed memories of military   accidents involving injured or killed personnel, and the recovery of   anthropomorphic dummies in military programs like Project High Dive   conducted in the 1950s.

Since the late 1990s the debate about Roswell has polarised with several   former pro-UFO researchers concluding that the craft was, indeed, part of a   US military project and that it was, most likely, some sort of weather   balloon. But further evidence has emerged – notably a signed affidavit by   Walter Haut, the Roswell Army Air Field public affairs officer who had   drafted the initial press release on July 8, 1947. Haut says in the   affidavit -signed in 2002 – that he saw alien corpses and a craft and that   he had been involved in a military cover up. Haut died in 2005.

4. Nasa faked the moon landings

People who think that the Apollo moon landings were not all that they seemed   at the time believe that Nasa faked some or all of the landings. Some of the   theories surrounding this subject are that the Apollo astronauts did not   land on the Moon; Nasa and possibly others intentionally deceived the public   into believing the landings did occur by manufacturing, destroying, or   tampering with evidence, including photos, telemetry tapes, transmissions,   and rock samples; and that Nasa and possibly others continue to actively   participate in the conspiracy to this day.

Those who think that Nasa faked some or all of the landings base their   theories on photographs from the lunar surface which they claim show camera   crosshairs partially behind rocks, a flag planted by Buzz Aldrin moving in a   strange way, the lack of stars over the lunar landscape and shadows falling   in different direction. Many commentators have published detailed rebuttals   to the hoax claims, and these theories have been generally discounted but   belief in them continues.

Source: Daily Telegraph Read More